The Current National Debt:

Posts tagged ‘DJIA’

What a difference a year makes

Last January I was beginning to get tired of reading stuff like “kitchen sink quarter” and “this is a great time to buy real estate” and “this is the time to buy stocks”.  One evening I happened to read a post by Doug Kass entitled “Buy the Financials. Yes, Buy” in which he made a case that it was a good time to buy the financials using XLF as a proxy.

You can read my original post here, and Doug Kass’ article here.

Anyhoo, I happened to be looking at XLF today, because I’m interested in FAZ – a 3x financial bear ETF that I sometimes use – and I decided to revisit my original post and update the numbers.

Mr. Kass mentioned the S&P 500 estimated earnings as one of the basis for his buy call.  At the time of his post, the estimated earnings for 2008 were $80.  2009 earnings estimates were at $85, and 2010 earnings estimates were at %90.

2008 earnings aren’t totally in yet, but S&P is now estimating them (clicking on the link will open an Excel file from S&P with these numbers) at $65.73 – which I think will turn out to be too high.  As to 2009 earnings, S&P has the current estimate at $81.52.

I’ll bet anyone as much money I can scrounge up that the 2009 earnings estimate of $81.52 is too high.  Does any rational thinker actually have reason to believe that 2009 earnings will come in 24% HIGHER than 2008?

My guess (and it’s only a guess) is that 2009 will come in closer to $40 or $50 than $81.  In other words, I think the current price for the S&P 500 is almost double what it should be if investors are looking at the earnings.  So no, this isn’t the bottom.

I didn’t think it was anywhere near the bottom last January when I said “I think it’s waaay to soon to be looking at this sector.  Personally, I think we’ll see a couple of big bank failures before the financial house of cards has collapsed fully.  No, I don’t know who it will be, but I do know that you don’t make money in the long run by borrowing money (especially at today’s higher rates) to pay down debt”

Side note – A few years ago my brother had an email signature line that said “Tis a vain man who quotes himself”.

Since I wrote the prediction of “a couple of big bank failures” last January, we’ve all seen the collapse of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, IndyMac, and Washington Mutual.  We’ve all seen the trillions wasted on bailouts of Citi, Bank of America, AIG, and even GM and Chrysler.

I’ve previously posted who has been bailed out by the taxpayers.  The list includes Citi (multiple times), Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Capital One (What’s in YOUR wallet?), Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley/Dean Witter (We make money the old fashioned way), US Bancorp, and Regions Bank.

I think my prediction of “a couple of big bank failures” has been vindicated….

A year ago I said “we’re heading into a very rough period for almost all asset classes, but “soft” things like made up financial assets and corporate profits (measured in the dollar) will fare much worse than “hard” assets, such as commodities.  Another 20% to 30% decline from here is not out of the question, so sell some stocks and put the proceeds into simple money market funds or commodities.

So how did that prediction turn out?  Here are some numbers:

Asset Jan 16th 08 Jan 16th 09 Change
S&P 500 1373.20 850.12 - 38.09%
DJIA 12466.16 8281.22 - 33.57%
NASDAQ 2394.59 1529.33 - 36.13%
XLF 27.17 9.68 - 64.37%
Gold (GLD) 86.70 82.71 - 4.60%
Silver (SLV) 15.65 11.11 - 29.01%
Euro (FXE) 146.81 133.01 - 9.40%
Oil (USO) 71.85 29.86 - 58.44%

So you can see that basically every asset class has lost money during 2008 – but absolutely nothing has lost more value than the financials as measured by XLF.

Don’t misunderstand my intent in posting this – I’m not claiming to understand how everything works.  I thought that commodities would take off during 2008 as the dollar weakened because of all the debt we were taking on.  In fact I still think that the dollar is way over-valued and the slide towards zero will soon resume.  But it didn’t happen like I expected it to happen last year.

We did have a very nice commodities boom in mid 2008 – but that turned out to be a bubble.  I still think that commodities are going to go up long term, but I “misunderestimated” (to borrow a term from our idiot President) the world-wide slowdown that happened in 2008. Oil was especially hard hit when worldwide demand fell off a cliff.

Long term, the US dollar is toast and commodity prices (as measured in dollars) must eventually go up to reflect the worthlessness of the dollar.  This is being exacerbated by the Fed’s insistence on printing up boatloads of worthless currency to use to bail out banks.  My advice is still to buy gold and silver.   Physical gold and silver – not the ETF’s.  Because when I say the US dollar is toast, I mean it.  You’ll want physical metal in your hand when our currency starts to look like Zimbabwe.

That’s a bit of an exaggeration to make the point, but inflation is going to take off at some point – it’s simple supply and demand.

I’m very happy that I moved money from stocks to a money market fund early last year.  I left 20% in US stocks, bonds, and overseas funds, and I kept putting my new 401K money into an S&P 500 index fund, so I still lost about 10% in my 401K last year.

So what’s going to happen this year?  In my opinion, the financials will drop more.  Their share values are being diluted every time the Fed does another round of bailouts – and that won’t end anytime soon.  Earnings will follow the same trend they did in 2008 – and stock prices will reflect the lower earnings.

Another side comment.  Have you noticed that stock prices tend to rise during earnings season?  No matter how bad the earnings actually are?  That’s because investors still want to believe that this is finally the “kitchen sink quarter”, they want to believe that all the writedowns and bad news are finally out there for everyone to see.  But they’ve been wrong for 5 straight quarters, and they’ll be wrong for at least a few more quarters.

After all the earnings have been reported, stocks tend to drop because everyone starts thinking that maybe it is that bad.  That the next quarter earnings are going to be even lower.  And prices drop until the next quarter reports when the cycle starts again.

If you’ve been to a mall, car dealership, or hardware store lately, you know that traffic in those stores are way down.  So are sales.  Which means profits will also be down.  So I don’t think this will turn around anytime soon.  4th quarter 2009 is the earliest that I think could bring an improvement in earnings – but that may change depending on how deep this recession turns out to be.

IF my earnings estimate ($40 to $50 for the S&P 500) turn out to be close to correct, you can expect to see the DJIA around 5000 and the S&P 500 around 500 sometime this year.  That’s another 40% drop from current levels.  So I think you’ll come out ahead by selling stocks (even after the big loss you might have taken in 2008) and putting your money into a money market account for now.  And I think putting it into gold and silver now will pay big benefits when (not if) inflation takes off.

gk

Sphere: Related Content

What moves the stock market?

I don’t know what news people are seeing that encourages them to buy stocks.  I meant to post this last night but didn’t get the time, so here goes.

The DJIA went up over 500 points yesterday and I’ll be damned if I can figure out why.  I kept an eye on the news headlines during the day, and here’s what they looked like at 2:45pm ET – just before the market skyrocketed into the close.  Here are the top headlines on MarketWatch.com as displayed by my “My Yahoo” page yesterday:

· Intel, H-P, Dell lead tech-sector losses - 14 minutes ago

· Citigroup looks for a new fall guy - 14 minutes ago

· Economic clouds could thwart some Obama energy promises - 14 minutes ago

· Energy stocks flirt with gains in volatile session - 14 minutes ago

· Chrysler’s survival difficult without government aid: CEO - 14 minutes ago

· GE shares fall back to 1996 levels on financing-cost concerns - 14 minutes ago

· U.S. stocks bounce back some after hitting new lows - 14 minutes ago

· Shares of Citigroup, Bank of America sink to decade-plus lows - 14 minutes ago

· Treasurys steady after 30-year bond auction - 14 minutes ago

· Gold dips below $700 as traders take more money off the table - 14 minutes ago

And here’s what the topr Reuters Business news were at the same time:

Jobless claims hit 25-year high, imports plunge - 1 hour ago

    • The number of U.S. workers drawing jobless benefits hit a 25-year high this month and imports suffered a record fall in September, according to reports on Thursday that underscored a rapid drop-off in…

      · Stocks cut losses; energy offsets tech drag - 36 minutes ago

      Stocks cut losses on Thursday, sending the Dow and S&P 500 back briefly into positive territory, as investors scoured the market for beaten-down shares, including those of energy companies, offsetting…

      · Top hedge funds see more rules ahead for industry - 53 minutes ago

      Some of the world’s richest and most powerful hedge fund managers told U.S. lawmakers on Thursday that they support greater transparency for the secretive industry, but offered divergent views on …

      · GE shares tumble, company confirms 2009 dividend - 1 hour ago

      General Electric Co (GE.N) confirmed on Thursday it plans to pay a dividend through the end of 2009, but shares of the U.S. conglomerate remained down sharply.

      · Goldman suspends GM rating, Chrysler urges aid - 53 minutes ago

      Goldman Sachs suspended its rating on General Motors Corp on Thursday and said the automaker needs at least $22 billion in federal aid, while Chrysler said it would be “very difficult to survive&…

      · RIM co-CEO says market environment is “intense” - 50 minutes ago

      The current market environment is rife with challenges and requires careful planning of strategy, the co-CEO of Research In Motion (RIM.TO)(RIMM.O) said on Thursday as an analyst warned that sales of …

      · Citigroup board says supports its chairman - 39 minutes ago

      Citigroup Inc’s (C.N) board of directors said it supports its chairman and a newspaper report that said it was considering replacing him was “completely erroneous.”

      · Oil rises 4 percent on OPEC, equity market rebound - 9 minutes ago

      Oil jumped over 4 percent on Thursday as OPEC seemed poised to cut production again later this month and equity markets rebounded.

      · Lawmakers challenge big banks on bailout funds - 36 minutes ago

      Senators asked the nation’s biggest banks on Thursday to explain how they are using the billions of taxpayer dollars provided to them under a massive government bailout program. The answers were m…

      · Qualcomm halts UMB project, sees no major job cuts - 11 minutes ago

      Qualcomm Inc (QCOM.O), seeking to cut costs in the face of slowing demand for cell phones, has stopped developing a next-generation wireless technology called Ultra Mobile Broadband and is making smal…

There’s not a single bit of good news hitting the wires, but yet the market reverses course and ends up almost 1000 points higher than the low for the day.  Makes no sense to me, but I don’t see anyway investors can continue to ignore the news that says earnings are falling dramatically.  At some point the “P” needs to adjust to the dramatic drop we’re seeing in the “E” in order to bring the Price/Earnings ratio back in line.

gk

Sphere: Related Content

Wow! What a ride!

The DJIA dropped another 675 points today, bringing it down to 8579.  Exactly one year ago, it was at 14,164 – its’ all time high.  Aren’t you glad you pulled all your money out of the market last year?

What’s that you say?  You didn’t move to cash because you’re in this for the long term, you’re a buy and hold investor?  Oops!

According to a story on CNN.com today, “We are in a free fall right now and fundamentals have been thrown out the window,” said Phil Orlando, chief equity market strategist at Federated Investors.

Ummm….  Wrong.  The “fundamentals” have NOT been thrown out the window Mr. Orlando – the fundamentals are what’s causing the drop.  We’re at the start of the 3rd quarter earnings season, and there’s no doubt that earnings will be drastically lower than Q3 of 07.

So stock prices HAVE to adjust to keep the price earnings ratio reasonable.  I guess the only question is how low earnings will be – which will tell us how low the stock prices will go.

With the latest drop, the S&P 500 is at a PE of about 12 – which is right about the long term mean.  We’ve been way above that for a long time, so I expect to see the PE “revert to the mean” long term, which means we need to go below a PE of 12 for awhile.  Possibly as low as 8 – which is what the ratio was back in the early 70’s and the great depression.

So, how low can we go?  Let me know if you have a guess.  I’m guessing maybe 7500?  But that’s just a guess.

gk

Sphere: Related Content

GE earnings miss isn’t a shocker

Wow, lots of stories today about the “shocking” earnings miss (and lowered forecast) by GE.  MarketWatch saidGE’s warning pokes hole in recent sentiment that credit crunch has passed” and “The rebound had been fueled by renewed sentiment on Wall Street that the worst of the credit crisis — including the threat of spiraling financial bankruptcies — was past.”

A story on CNN said “My guess is that earnings forecasts for 2008 are still pretty high relative to the economic reality,” Davidson said.

I have one word for Mr. Davidson - Duh!

As I posted just yesterday, I don’t think we’re anywhere close to a bottom yet, and the earnings estimates for 2008 and 2009 are way too high.  Eventually, stock prices adjust to reflect earnings, and sometimes the adjustment process is long and painful – as we all learned in 2000 through 2003.

All the stories about Goldman Sachs’ and Lehman CEO’s saying that they can see the light at the end of the tunnel – while simultaneously upping their own writedowns – are crap.  If the CEO’s are so good at predicting the future, why couldn’t they tell us what losses their own companies were going to have?

Speaking of Goldman, I think the glitter is coming off.  This past week they announced that the amount of “Level 3 assets” increased from $69 billion to $96 billion during the first quarter.  If you haven’t been keeping score, “level 3″ assets are those for which there’s basically no market, no one wants them, so Goldman is stuck with them. 

Kinda like having a house that’s “worth” $1 million, but no one will buy it, so you’re stuck with the mortgage payments – but you can say you have a $1 million house.  At least until you have to sell it because you can’t make the payments any longer – then it suddenly becomes a $500k house – and you just lost $500k.

It also means that the value of those assets is a 100% guess.  In effect, Goldman is saying “we think we might have $96 billion in assets, but we really don’t know what they’d be worth if we tried to sell them.  They might be worth $96 billion (but we’re almost certain that that’s not right) but they might be worth 3 cents on the dollar.  We don’t have a clue, so we pulled that $96 billion number out of our butt.”

Level 3 assets are, by definition, “hard to value”.  In fact, they are impossible to value, because no one will buy them.  So companies use a “mark to model” method to come up with a number.  And since “mark to model” varies depending on the model used, we’re back where we started – no one has any idea what these assets are worth.

You may be asking why it’s a bad thing that the value of the assets rose so much in one quarter, and that’s a good question.  Wouldn’t it be a good thing if my $1 million house went up to $1.5 million in one quarter?   The answer to why it’s bad is that it’s a made up number.  I know that this is probably getting old but you need to understand it – NO ONE WILL BUY IT AT ANY PRICE RIGHT NOW!

Your next question is probably something like “why would they make up a higher number for these assets if that’s viewed as a negative?  Another good question, but the answer is easy.  You see, if you claim that your assets are worth more, you can use them as collateral so you can borrow more money.

Kinda neat isn’t it?  Goldman increased its’ ability to borrow by $27 billion in just one quarter.  But who would take these level 3 assets as collateral you ask?  You’re on your “A” game tonight dear reader – another good question.

The answer is that there’s only one place to go to borrow against these assets that no one will buy – the Fed.  You and me (via the government) are loaning Goldman billions of dollars by allowing them to give (I’m going to make up some numbers here – let’s call them “level 3″ numbers) the Fed $10 billion in level 3 assets.  In exchange, the Fed give Goldman $10 billion in Treasuries.

So you and I are now on the hook for $10 billion of basically worthless assets, while Goldman now has $10 billion of nice safe Treasuries.  Nice trick ain’t it?  That’s the Federal Reserve’s new Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF) in a nutshell.

That’s one of the ways that the Fed is propping up the banks and brokerage houses right now – short of an indirect buyout like they did with Bear Stearns anyway.  But sooner or later, the losses from these made up level 3 assets need to be accounted for. 

The only question remaining is who will pay for the losses – the banks who made the risky loans, the investment houses that took the risky loans and leveraged them, or the taxpayer.  My best level 3 guess is that we’ll see a combination of the above, but taxpayers will eat a significant chunk of the losses.

As a result, the Fed will have to print more money to pay the bills, so the dollar will continue to fall, and the stock market will drop in inflation adjusted terms – and quite probably in real terms as well.  Within the next 12 months, Dow 9,000 is much more likely than Dow 15,000 in my opinion.

gk

 

 

 

Sphere: Related Content

Shifting Sentiment

I was reading an article on CNN tonight and happened to see these lines:

But sentiment seems to be shifting as of late.

“It’s still too early to tell,” said Thomas Nyheim, portfolio manager at Christiana Bank & Trust. “But I do think that when you have Ben Bernanke, the IMF, and all these strategists saying we are in a recession or about to see one, and the market doesn’t sell off much, that tells you something.”

I agree that sentiment is shifting – how else do you explain the stock markets’ reluctance to go down in the face of all the bad news?  It’s certainly possible that we’re “climbing a wall of worry” and that the short downturn in stocks is over – but I don’t think so.

There is too much optimism for me right now.  It seems that no matter how bad the news is, the stocks affected rally.  It’s like investors are thinking “At last, this is everything.  It’s all out there now.  Things can’t possibly get any worse, so there’s nowhere to go but up.”

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but yes Virginia, things can get worse.  And I think they will. 

I’ve been playing with an Excel spreadsheet of earnings from Standard and Poors website.  Their 2007 estimate of $82.54 was high (actual was $70.83) and I think their 2008 estimate of $96.74 is way too high – by at least $20.

In other words, official estimates are looking for 2008 earnings to be HIGHER than the 2007 results.  I don’t think there’s anyway that’s going to happen.  The first quarter results will be a lot lower than last year (overall) and we are still in the early stages of the massive deleveraging that needs to happen as the housing market gets worse.

Stocks might be higher a month from now – but I doubt it.  They might be higher 6 months from now, but I doubt that too.  Unless there’s a massive (1500 to 2000 point) correction in the DJIA between now and then, stocks will continue to trade in the 12800 to 12200 range.

We may go down slowly, or we may see a huge two or three day slide, but stocks WILL eventually correct to reflect the earnings.  I’m just sitting on the sidelines waiting for that to happen.  If it doesn’t happen (I’ll be very surprised!) I’ll get back into the market when the 75 day EMA crosses over the 200 day EMA.  And we’re nowhere close to that happening.

gk

 

Sphere: Related Content