The Current National Debt:

Posts tagged ‘Congress’

Bailout Pork – Just Say NO!

I ran across something very interesting today regarding the bailout bill that the Senate passed last night.  Here’s a story on Marketwatch.com that’s the tip of the iceberg.  It’s titled Can the ‘William Tell amendment’ save the bailout?

Here’s the first part of it: There can’t have been a more ridiculous bit of legal fluff in recent memory. Yet there it is, in plain view, as part of the much-ballyhooed Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 that’s been passed by the U.S. Senate.

Namely, Section 503 — “Exemption from excise tax for certain wooden arrows designed for children.” The toy arrow provision, also dubbed the “William Tell amendment,” was jointly introduced by Oregon’s two U.S. senators: Ron Wyden, a Democrat, and Gordon Smith, a Republican.

That’s right – part of this “urgently needed” bailout of dumbasses is to exempt “certain wooden arrows designed for children” from the excise tax.

Don’t get me wrong – I don’t have anything against wooden arrows – and I mainly agree with anything regarding less taxes, but to claim that pork like this will make the bailout bill more likely to pass the House is (I hope!) just stupid.

The cost of the bill is up to an estimated $800 billion – but no one knows for sure.  They don’t know because it’s a pork laden monstrosity.

Title I of the”Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007″ (yes, that’s still the name of the bailout bill) establishes the Troubled Assets Relief Program.

The name TARP is appropriate, because basically they’re attempting to sweep all the toxic mortgages and derivatives that the brilliant Wall Street crowd invested in under a giant rug.  So I guess you could hide it under a TARP just as well….

I literally don’t know where to begin when talking about the pork in this bill.  I guess I’ll start at the top and work my way down to give you some idea of how bloated this thing has become.  It started as 3 pages.  It’s up to 442.

Here’s the text of the bill in PDF format from the GPO.  Please use this link to access the text of the bill.  I apologize, but the links below won’t work because of the stupid search engine Thomas uses.

Here are the first few “urgent” parts of the bill.  In reality, it’s just pork thrown in to get Representatives to vote for it:

That’s just the renewable energy section.  Just below that, we get these barrels of pork thrown at the coal industry:

That should be enough pork thrown at energy projects right?  Remember, the whole purpose of this is to bail out the financial industry….  But you’d be wrong if that’s what you thought.  Take a look atthe part named Title II:

TITLE II–TRANSPORTATION AND DOMESTIC FUEL SECURITY PROVISIONS

Yup, more pork – this time thrown at the alternative energy crowd.  NOTE – I’m a proponent of alternative energy – I just don’t want the governemnt to fund it!

Let’s see, what’s next in this budget busting bailout bill….  Crap, more energy credits…

Ok, I’ll skip on down and see what else there is….  O goody, Alternative Minimum Tax relief….  This is another good idea, but why is it in this bill?

A little further down (believe it or not, I’m skipping entire sections!) we find gems such as:

SEC. 314. INDIAN EMPLOYMENT CREDIT.

SEC. 316. RAILROAD TRACK MAINTENANCE.

And check this out – the wool subsidy is back!

There’s even a tax break for people who received settlements from the Exxon Valdez spill….

SEC. 504. INCOME AVERAGING FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXXON VALDEZ LITIGATION.

I’m not making any of this up!  Here’s pork thrown to the Midwest:

SEC. 702. TEMPORARY TAX RELIEF FOR AREAS DAMAGED BY 2008 MIDWESTERN SEVERE STORMS, TORNADOS, AND FLOODING.

And pork to the area hit by Hurricane Ike:

SEC. 704. TEMPORARY TAX-EXEMPT BOND FINANCING AND LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX RELIEF FOR AREAS DAMAGED BY HURRICANE IKE.

I doubt it, but all of these sections may have merit and may be useful.  But that doesn’t mean they should be included in this bill, slipped through just to get more pork back to the home districts.  If they’re worthwhile, let them be voted on, one at a time.  See if they can stand on their own merits.  Hah!

Please, call your Representatives and ask them to vote this down!  Tell them you’ve had enough of this kind of crap coming out of Washington – tell them no more!

If you’ve read this far, you’ve got to be concerned.  PLEASE contact your Representative and tell them how you feel.  The Senate passed this crap, but this train wreck of a bailout bill can still be stopped before they vote tomorrow if enough of us contact our Representatives.

gk

Sphere: Related Content

Financial Bailout Plan

This needs to be read by more people, so more people can contact congress to let them know what they think of it.  I’ll post the reasons for my own thoughts later (I think it sucks!) but for now, here’s the text of the proposed plan according to the NY TImes.  Please read it and let congress know what you think!

gk

LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL FOR TREASURY AUTHORITY

TO PURCHASE MORTGAGE-RELATED ASSETS

Section 1. Short Title.

This Act may be cited as ____________________.

Sec. 2. Purchases of Mortgage-Related Assets.

(a) Authority to Purchase.–The Secretary is authorized to purchase, and to make and fund commitments to purchase, on such terms and conditions as determined by the Secretary, mortgage-related assets from any financial institution having its headquarters in the United States.

(b) Necessary Actions.–The Secretary is authorized to take such actions as the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the authorities in this Act, including, without limitation:

(1) appointing such employees as may be required to carry out the authorities in this Act and defining their duties;

(2) entering into contracts, including contracts for services authorized by section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, without regard to any other provision of law regarding public contracts;

(3) designating financial institutions as financial agents of the Government, and they shall perform all such reasonable duties related to this Act as financial agents of the Government as may be required of them;

(4) establishing vehicles that are authorized, subject to supervision by the Secretary, to purchase mortgage-related assets and issue obligations; and

(5) issuing such regulations and other guidance as may be necessary or appropriate to define terms or carry out the authorities of this Act.

Sec. 3. Considerations.

In exercising the authorities granted in this Act, the Secretary shall take into consideration means for–

(1) providing stability or preventing disruption to the financial markets or banking system; and

(2) protecting the taxpayer.

Sec. 4. Reports to Congress.

Within three months of the first exercise of the authority granted in section 2(a), and semiannually thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Committees on the Budget, Financial Services, and Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committees on the Budget, Finance, and Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate with respect to the authorities exercised under this Act and the considerations required by section 3.

Sec. 5. Rights; Management; Sale of Mortgage-Related Assets.

(a) Exercise of Rights.–The Secretary may, at any time, exercise any rights received in connection with mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act.

(b) Management of Mortgage-Related Assets.–The Secretary shall have authority to manage mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act, including revenues and portfolio risks therefrom.

(c) Sale of Mortgage-Related Assets.–The Secretary may, at any time, upon terms and conditions and at prices determined by the Secretary, sell, or enter into securities loans, repurchase transactions or other financial transactions in regard to, any mortgage-related asset purchased under this Act.

(d) Application of Sunset to Mortgage-Related Assets.–The authority of the Secretary to hold any mortgage-related asset purchased under this Act before the termination date in section 9, or to purchase or fund the purchase of a mortgage-related asset under a commitment entered into before the termination date in section 9, is not subject to the provisions of section 9.

Sec. 6. Maximum Amount of Authorized Purchases.

The Secretary’s authority to purchase mortgage-related assets under this Act shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time

Sec. 7. Funding.

For the purpose of the authorities granted in this Act, and for the costs of administering those authorities, the Secretary may use the proceeds of the sale of any securities issued under chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, and the purposes for which securities may be issued under chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, are extended to include actions authorized by this Act, including the payment of administrative expenses. Any funds expended for actions authorized by this Act, including the payment of administrative expenses, shall be deemed appropriated at the time of such expenditure.

Sec. 8. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

Sec. 9. Termination of Authority.

The authorities under this Act, with the exception of authorities granted in sections 2(b)(5), 5 and 7, shall terminate two years from the date of enactment of this Act.

Sec. 10. Increase in Statutory Limit on the Public Debt.

Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu thereof $11,315,000,000,000.

Sec. 11. Credit Reform.

The costs of purchases of mortgage-related assets made under section 2(a) of this Act shall be determined as provided under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, as applicable.

Sec. 12. Definitions.

For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

(1) Mortgage-Related Assets.–The term “mortgage-related assets” means residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before September 17, 2008.

(2) Secretary.–The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Treasury.

(3) United States.–The term “United States” means the States, territories, and possessions of the United States and the District of Columbia.

Sphere: Related Content

Oil Speculation

The news is full of (no, not that!) stories about Congress investigating the role of oil speculation today.  A CNN story says “Near-record oil prices could quickly fall by half if Congress were to rein in speculators“. 

Sounds good – so what’s the hold up?  If Congress could simply pass a law that would drop oil prices by half, why don’t they? 

After all (the story goes on to say) “The testimony came as Congress, reflecting some sentiment among the public, blamed Wall Street traders for record oil and gasoline prices.”

let’s make sure we have this straight – Congress (and the public at large) are blaming “Wall Street traders” for the record oil and gas prices, and Congress could drop the price by 50% if they wanted to.  Am I missing anything?

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention one little bitty item: OIL IS A GLOBALLY TRADED COMMODITY!

In other words, disregard everything above, because (as the story eventually gets to) if it’s not traded on Wall Street, it’ll be traded in London, or Toyko, or Hong Kong.  The last time I checked, Congress can’t do a damn thing regarding regulating markets in other countries.  Oops…..

If you read to the end of the story, you eventually get to these two paragraphs:

Though many Democratic and some Republican politicians have furiously blamed speculation for driving up the price of oil, many analysts argue that the market fundamentals of supply and demand are the cause of record prices.

“If it is a bubble, then where is the evidence in the actual physical market?” asked Kevin Norrish, a commodities analyst with Barclays Capital in London. “There is an endless list of reasons why this argument is a very, very poor one – it will only make things worse.”

One thing that the idiots in Congress (and elsewhere) have forgotten is that “speculators” are only trading in the futures market – no physical oil changes hands. 

Here’s a quick example if you don’t understand.  Let’s say I buy a futures contract at $135/barrel for July delivery.  What do I do when the producer I bought it from drops off a tank truck full of oil at my front door?  Have you seen any oil tankers on Wall Street?   That’s what I thought.

In other words, if I buy up a bunch of futures contracts, I have to sell them before the contract date – I have no use for the oil!  Remember supply and demand?  If I bought oil for July delivery, I have to sell it before July – what happens to the price of oil if there’s no demand for what I bought? 

It’ll drop, big time.  So “speculators” must sell their oil before it’s delivered – if there’s no demand for it, they’ll have to sell at a loss.  If the demand has gone up, they make a profit. 

So what happens if Saudi Arabia pumps 5 million barrels of oil more in July than they did in June?  Supply has gone up so (assuming that demand has remained constant) the price will drop.  Supply and demand controls the price of oil.

Side note: There’s no way Saudi Arabia can pump that much more oil – I personally think we’re at “peak oil” right now at around 86 million barrels per day.  So with a constant or falling supply, and steady or increasing demand, the price must go up.  It doesn’t matter if we’re talking about oil or eggs or plywood or SUV’s – supply and demand rule.  As they should.

Any questions?

gk

 

Sphere: Related Content